Picture in your mind a young girl
that is almost done with her freshman year of high school. These next few years are supposed to be some
of the best years of this girl’s life.
But instead of this young girl worrying about what clothes she is going
to wear, or how she is going to style her hair, she has to worry about side
effects of chemotherapy. Melinda has
been diagnosed with Hodskins Lymphoma, a cancer of
the lymph nodes, at age fifteen. When
all the other fifteen-year-old girls are busy chasing boys and dealing will all
the drama that comes with high school Melinda is in the hospital getting blood
transfusions because the chemo has depleted her of necessary cells.
The chemo that Melinda has transfused
into her has many side effects that come with it. The chemo basically kills a person in order
to kill the cancer cells. These side
effects include nausea, intense pain and a loss of appetite. There is only one drug that exists today that
has the potential to cure all of the above side effects, and that is
marijuana. This drug is currently
illegal, and doctors cannot prescribe it to patients.
This issue affects college students
because we are the ones that are going to play a role in this debate in the
future. Many of us are going to become
doctors, FBI agents, or United States Senators.
That is why college students need to be informed about this complex
issue. We are the ones that are going to
be making decisions about this issue later on in our lives.
The debate on legalizing marijuana for medical use is not just a simple
pro/con debate. It is a very complex
issue that has many different approaches to it, and in each of the approaches
there are differences of opinion. Three
main sides to this debate are the medical approach, government and enforcement
approach, and the lawmaker approach.
The medical approach consists of
doctors that treat cancer patients, and cultural beliefs that since marijuana
is illegal it should not be used at all.
Some doctors and people of the public believe that marijuana should be
used to treat side effects of chemotherapy, and other doctors and people of the
public believe that it should not be used as a medicine.
Many doctors believe that marijuana
works as a great pain killer, appetite increaser, and it reduced nausea. Since the legalization of medicinal
marijuana in California, many patients have said that marijuana is the only
thing that helps achieve symptom relief (Eidelman).
In some cases patients report that marijuana enhances the effects of
prescription drugs, which might have been helping, but not enough (Eidelman). Dr. Eidelmen, a physician in California that supports
marijuana, is a firm believer that marijuana is a great asset for treating
cancer patients. Not only does it help
relive side effects from the chemo, it also works together with drugs already
prescribed to them.
Not all doctors, however, believe
that marijuana should be used to treat side effects in cancer patients. According to Dr. Hiebert,
a doctor that uses hypnosis to help people quit smoking marijuana, “There is no concrete evidence that marijuana
has any medical value. Dr. Hiebert claims that,
“Smoking marijuana makes glaucoma and the symptoms of multiple sclerosis
worse, not better.” Dr. Hiebert has the exact
opposite opinion from the other physicians above. He believes that marijuana does not have any
positive effects on the human system.
The only thing that marijuana does to the system is damage it.
Another part of the medical approach
is the cultural belief that since marijuana is illegal it could not be a
medicine. The general public trusts the
government’s decision in making it illegal.
Since the government made it an illegal substance it could only be
harmful to you. “If the drug is harmful
to you, then how can it ever be used as a medicine”, said Randall Schamp, a hard working American. Many people share this same opinion, which
will not help physicians that want marijuana legal for medical reasons convince
the public to allow that to happen.
The lawmaker approach, which
consists of people in the judicial system, are the ones that make the final
decisions in issues like medical marijuana.
The US Supreme Court has opened hearings on whether the distribution of
marijuana for medical purposes should become legal under federal law (Josefson). The case has been prompted by legislation in
California in 1996 allowing marijuana to be used for medical purposes (Josefson). This is showing that some courts are showing leniency
towards marijuana. Most people believe
that the courts are very strict on the issue of legalizing marijuana, but this
article shows us the exact opposite. The
courts are not always straight edge when is comes to marijuana.
Federal courts are very serious
about the reasons why marijuana is illegal, and aim to keep it illegal. A House Judiciary panel passed a resolution
rejecting the legalization of marijuana for medical use (Alcoholism Reports). Marijuana is labeled as a dangerous and
addictive drug, because it falls under the Controlled Substances Act. Do to this fact the conclusion has been made
that marijuana is physically and psychologically damaging, no matter what it is
used for (Alcoholism Reports). According
to the annual Alcoholism report the federal judicial branch is not in favor of
legalizing marijuana for medical reasons at all. They believe that it is just as dangerous as
cocaine. That it is just as damaging and
addicting as any illegal drug out there.
The government and enforcement
approach has a lot of influence on whether or not marijuana will be legalized
for medical uses. In states where
marijuana has been voted to be legal for medical purposes, governmental
officials still use their power to encourage people not to use marijuana for
any reasons. Within weeks after voters
in Arizona approves propositions allowing physicians to prescribe marijuana for
medical purposes the Attorney General sprang into action (Kassirer).
Attorney Janet Reno announced that physicians in any state who prescribed the
drug could lose the privilege of writing prescriptions. This shows that the federal government has
power greater than the state governments, and it shows that the federal
government does not approve of marijuana being used for medical reasons.
It is not just the federal
government that is opposed to legalizing marijuana for medical uses. Here in Colorado Senator Wayne Allard is
opposed to the entire idea. In an e-mail
I received Senator Wayne Allard said, “I have not supported any legislation
that would provide therapeutic use of marijuana to treat illness.” He supported his stance on the debate by
saying, “The Food and Drug Administration has rejected marijuana for medical
use in the past and has discontinued its single patient investigational new
drug program for therapeutic marijuana due to a lack of support for beneficial
claims.” After reading this letter from
my Senator I have learned that republicans in Colorado do not support using
marijuana for medical use. I also learned
that the FDA had totally given up on researching benefits that marijuana could
give to people suffering from cancer.
The government officials have their
influence on this debate, but the police also have their say. The most difficult part for police officers
is going to be determining who can legally possess marijuana. Also, in states that have made medical
marijuana legal, it is still against federal law to smoke it. In the six states that marijuana has been
voted to be legal to use for medical purposes, federal law still requires them
to prosecute any cancer patient smoking a bong (Hornblower). This leads to much confusion for the law
enforcers. They do not know which
individuals are allowed to posses and consume marijuana, so police officers
will arrest anyone they see smoking marijuana.
These confusions led Chief Brown of
Arcata, California to take mug shots of those that can legally consume
marijuana. These mug shots are then
printed on a “City of Arcada Proposition 215
Identification Card”. Now when the legal
user is smoking their marijuana they just have to show police officers their ID
card and they will not be arrested (Hornblower). The only exception to this is if you posses
more than ten marijuana plants; the limit on plants is to distinguish users
from illegal distribution.
The debate over the legalization of marijuana for medical reasons has arguments from three main approaches: medical approach, lawmaker approach, and the government and law enforcement approach. Having debates from these three sides of the issue prove that this issue is a very complex one, and it affects everyone especially the college students of this country. The college students are the future of this country, and they are the ones that are going to be making the decisions on this issue in the future. Educate yourselves on this subject, so that when making decisions on this subject later in life you make the smart one.