To the Writer: Briefly describe your target audience
and purpose. Include your audience’s position and their key
interests and concerns in relation to your focus issue. Also, indicate what you want your workshop readers to focus on as they read and
comment on your draft.
To the Reader/Responder: Respond to the following questions once you’re familiar with the
writer’s context for his/her argument.
1.
Underline the thesis/overall claim
(or the lines/passages that most clearly signal the thesis) on the draft. Is the thesis the writer wants to argue for clear?
Is it debatable? Is it
clearly stated or implied? Make
suggestions for improvement.
2.
Is
the thesis adequately focused—narrowed
and/or qualified—so that it is defensible and takes into consideration
legitimate opposing arguments or objections readers may have? How could the
writer qualify or include exceptions
in order to avoid generalizations?
3.
Look
at how the writer has structured the
argument. Do you have a clear sense of
where the argument is going? Where do
you get confused? Outline the writer’s
structure. Is the structure/approach coherent with the writer’s audience and purpose. Where might the
writer need to revise the structure or provide more transitions? Explain.
4.
Where and how does the paper address opposing
arguments that contrast the writer’s thesis or position? Mark OA
in the margin of the draft for each opposing argument. How successfully do you feel the paper responds to key opposing arguments?
5.
Consider
the writer’s evidence. How
well does the evidence offered support the reasons? Where is more evidence needed? What kind of evidence is needed to help
strengthen the argument? Mark (MORE) on
the draft where you would recommend more evidence or explanation.
6.
Given
the writer’s context (including the
defined audience and purpose), how effectively does the paper integrate a range of appeals (logical, ethical/character, emotion) to convince
the readers? Is there an appropriate
“balance” of appeals? Where would you
like to see more or less appeal to
logic/reason, emotion, or the writer’s credibility?
7.
What
are one or two areas that you feel the writer should address first in revising this draft? What suggestions can you offer for
accomplishing those revisions or improvements?