Writing@CSU

Writing Guides

Working in Groups

Introduction

Why Work in Groups?

Writing Tasks Suited to Group Work

Papers Requiring "Original" Research

Papers Requiring Library Research

Any Type of Argument

Interpretations

Cultural Analyses

Lab/Field Reports

Any Type of Evaluation

Fact and Fiction: Common Fears about Group Work

My individual ideas will be lost...

I could write it better myself...

My grade will depend on what others do...

Group work will take more time than if I did it myself...

My group members aren't as smart as I am...

We won't be able to agree...

I don't have time to meet out of class...

I would learn more doing it on my own...

I'll end up doing all the work...

What to Expect in Group Work

Agreement

Conflict

Socializing

Wrong Decisions

Unequal Commitments

Choosing Group Members

Time in Common to Meet

Individual Strengths and Weaknesses

Diversity

Commitment

Guidelines for Group Work

Rule One

Rule Two

Rule Three

Rule Four

Rule Five

Initial Decision-Making

Agree on a Meeting Format

Construct Rules for Discussions

Construct a Timeline

Agree on Penalities for Missing Meetings Deadlines

Discuss what Each Member Brings to the Group

Idea-Generating and Research Tasks

Library Research

Field Research

Evaluating Sources

Deciding on a Focus

Coming to Consensus on the Main Point and Organization

Writing the Paper Together

Determine What the Final Paper Should "Sound" Like

Divide the Writing Tasks

Gather to Write Together

Delegate Various Responsibilities

Using Group Time Profitably

Be Prepared

Set an Agenda

Appoint a Secretary

Negotiate

Disagree

Be Strict about Deadlines

Dealing With Problems in a Group

Clarify Your Expectations Early

Monitor the Group

Discuss Problems

Addtional Resources

Library Resources

Topic

Focus

Purpose

Organization

E-mail

Related Resources View Related Resources
Print-Friendly Page Print Page
Authors & Contributors

  
Writing@CSU Home Page | Writing Guides | Working in Groups

Any Type of Evaluation

An evaluation paper, such as reviews, critiques, or case reports, implies the ability to make and defend a judgment. judgments, as we all know, can be very idiosyncratic when only one person interprets the data or object at hand. As a result, performing an evaluation in a group allows you to gain multiple perspectives, challenge each other's ideas and assumptions, and thus defend a judgment that may not be as subject to bias.

Copyright © 1993-2009 Colorado State University and/or this site's authors, developers, and contributors. Some material displayed on this site is used with permission.