Writing@CSU

Writing Guides

Writing Summaries

Introduction

The Standard Summary - Form and Function

More on Form and Function

As an End In Itself

nutshell statement

Example Article

Example Précis

detailed summaries

Example Article

Example Detailed Summary

As Part of a Response or Position Paper

Using Author Tags

Example Summary

As Part of an Annotated Bibliography

Example Objective Annotated Bibliography Entry

Example Critical Annotated Bibliography Entry

As Part of a Larger Paper

Example of Summary to Set Context in a Review of Literature

Concise Statement of the Main Idea

More on the Concise Statement

Example Summary

Test Your Ability

Citing the Author and Title

Details and Quotes

View More on Details and Quotations

Using Details

Example Summary

Using Quotations

View Steve Hill Article

View Example Summary of Steve Hill Article

Documenting Sources

Style and Tone

More on Style and Tone

Objectivity

Example Summaries

Brevity

Example Summaries

Verb Tense

Using Author Tags

Example Summary

Putting it All Together

Example Summary

Processes for Writing Summaries

View More on Source Analysis to Jump-Start Summary

Process For Finding Main Point

Steps for Finding the Main Point

Process For Summarizing Support

Steps for Summarizing Support

View More on Writing to Jump-Start Summary

Process For Finding Main Point

Steps for Finding the Main Point

Process For Summarizing Support

Steps for Summarizing Support

Additional Resources

Related Resources View Related Resources
Print-Friendly Page Print Page
Authors & Contributors

  
Writing@CSU Home Page | Writing Guides | Summaries

Example Critical Annotated Bibliography Entry

Back Back to as Part of an Annotated Bibliography

Rosen, Jeffrey. "The end of obscenity." The New Republic July 1996: 6-7.

In this article, Rosen talks about the Internet and the overturn of the Communications Decency Act. He believes the Philadelphia judges who overturned this Act deserve credit for enumerating the possibility of one person corrupting cyberspace with obscenities, but they did not take into account that the public are the ones who decipher what is considered to be obscenity. This article appears in a professional publication that targets readers concerned with law and the government. This article is useful to our research because it has to do with language on the Internet and the censorship of it.

Copyright © 1993-2009 Colorado State University and/or this site's authors, developers, and contributors. Some material displayed on this site is used with permission.