< Day 5 - Friday, September 6<sup>th</sup>

Day 5 - Friday, September 6th

What You’ll Do in Class Today

·        Use student’s homework to discuss writing a summary of Schrag's essay

·        Discuss effective use of paraphrasing and quoting. (See page 194 in PHG.)

·        Introduce the concept of responding.

Connection to Course Goals

Discussing Schrag's essay will help students apply their knowledge about academic summary to a much more lengthy and complicated essay. Similarly, discussing effective use of paraphrasing and quoting will help students write more accurate and concise summaries (especially when dealing with longer texts). Introducing all three types of response will prepare students to think about the various ways they can respond to a text and develop their ideas with reasons and evidence. Responding is also important for the thematic aims of this course because it allows students to invest their own ideas on issues of public importance.

Activities

1.      Model Introduction: “Today we’ll continue discussing summary, applying ideas to Schrag’s essay (since his essay is more challenging than Singer’s text). We’ll also review how to effectively paraphrase and quote from a text. This is a useful skill to learn for writing summaries (especially for writing summaries of longer texts, like Schrag’s). Finally, we’ll look at the different ways you might respond to an essay after you’ve successfully summarized it.”

2.      Use students' homework to discuss summarizing Schrag's essay: This activity aims to get students thinking about how they might organize all of the key points and evidence from Schrag's essay into an academic summary.

Part I (10 minutes): Tell students that you'd like them to practice summarizing a complicated essay by listing all of the main points and important evidence from Schrag's essay on the board. Guide this discussion by writing the following categories on the board, and have students use their homework to generate responses:

Schrag's Purpose:

 

Schrag's Overall Argument or Main Point:

 

Schrag's Audience:

 

Key Points made by Proponents of High Stakes Testing:

 

 

Key Points made by Opponents of High Stakes Testing:

Important Evidence:

 

 

Why Evidence is Important to Writer's Purpose:

 

**Note: Be sure you've read through Schrag's essay beforehand and generated your own answers for this activity so you're prepared to deal with various responses in class. If students offer incorrect answers, ask them to refer to the text to show you where their ideas came from. If possible, try to avoid having to take on the role of correcting them yourself. Encouraging students to respond to each other's ideas will make the class more student-centered and means you don't have to come down on them for being wrong. But, of course, do correct them if the class fails to. A little discomfort now is better than leaving people with a misinterpretation of the essay.

Model Transition to Next Activity: Now that we know what could be included in an academic summary for Schrag's essay, let's think about how we might select and arrange this information.

Part II (15-20 minutes): Have students break up into groups of three. Ask them to generate a tentative outline for how they might organize the information on the board into an academic summary. One method for facilitating this activity is to pass out dry erase markers and have them write on overhead transparencies. This way, students can easily present their group work to the class. Or, just have them write on paper. Ask students to consider: How would they start their summary? How long should it be? Which information seems most important to include? Which points seem less important? Tell them that they do not have to write out a complete summary for Schrag’s essay; just an outline with a list of ideas.

Have two or three groups present their outlines. You might wander around the room as they work and choose groups whose outlines look the strongest (secretly, of course). After they present, ask them to explain why they decided to structure their summary this way. Be sure to point out what you think is effective from their outline and also how it could be improved.

Model Transition to Next Activity: Since there is so much information for an academic summary of Schrag's essay, it would help to think about ways to efficiently represent all of the key points. One way to ensure that you're covering all of the key points in a concise manner is to paraphrase or condense lengthy quotes.

3.      Discuss effective use of paraphrasing and quoting (10 minutes): Design an activity where you model effective and ineffective use of paraphrasing and quoting. You might prepare examples beforehand OR have students help generate ideas using Schrag's essay.

Cover the following points (Use page 194 in the PHG as a guide):

a.       Discuss where and how often students should use paraphrasing and quoting in their summaries. (For example: It is ineffective to string together several quotes, as this infringes on the writer's voice; but it is also ineffective to paraphrase too often, as ideas need to be supported with textual evidence).

b.      Explain that quotes need to logically fit into the sentence structure. For example:

o       Ineffective: Schrag argues, "…parents face the possibility that their children will not graduate, pressure to lower the bar…will almost certainly increase."

o       Effective: Schrag argues that, "…as more parents face the possibility that their children will not graduate, pressure to lower the bar…will almost certainly increase."

c.       Review any other points mentioned in the PHG or that you feel are important.

Model Transition to Next Activity: For the last ten minutes of class, we're going to shift our focus from summarizing to responding. For homework today, I asked you to read about the different types of responses listed on page 162- 163 in the PHG. If you recall, your audience for Essay 1 will be most interested in your response. So it's important that we start thinking about the different types of response you can provide. Please open your books to… .

4.      Introduce the concept of responding (10 minutes): The goal of this discussion is to briefly introduce students to all three types of response: agree/disagree, interpretive/reflective, analytic/evaluative. They will practice all three types with upcoming essays. For now, it's only important that they understand the differences between each type. Also, let them know that a combination of responses is possible for Essay 1. If they choose a combination, however, they need to be sure that their response makes an overall point.

Review the points on page 162 in the PHG, highlighting important concepts and phrases, and check out the teaching guide on Types of Summary and Response (http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/teaching/summaryresponse/). Be sure to discuss kinds of evidence and ask students to consider which kinds of evidence would work best for different types of response. Since students will be writing an agree/disagree response to Schrag's essay for homework, you might focus the conversation here. Remind them that, in addition to giving a response, they must also provide reasons and evidence to show readers why they agree or disagree with an idea.

5.      Model Conclusion: “Today we considered approaches to summarizing a more complicated essay. Hopefully, you’re starting to feel more comfortable with these concepts. We’ll continue to practice summarizing, but for the remainder of the portfolio, our discussions will focus on responding. If you’re still struggling with summary concepts, you should visit my office hours or drop by the Writing Center in the basement of Eddy.”

Assignment

Choose one main idea from Schrag's essay and write a one-and-a-half to two-page response to that idea. Write out the main idea, providing author tags to show whose idea it is. Then, respond to the idea, stating whether you agree or disagree with it. Give reasons for why you agree or disagree and provide specific evidence to show why you feel this way (personal experience, cultural observations, or textual evidence). Post your response to the class discussion forum on Syllabase. Bring a printed copy of your response to class.